In case the employee fails to serve a grievance notice, the NIRC may perhaps dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer has not had a chance to respond to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In certain cases, the NIRC may well allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to include the grievance notice. However, this is normally only completed When the employee can show that that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. Inside the present case, the parties were allowed to lead evidence as well as the petitioner company responded towards the allegations as such they were well aware about the allegations and led the evidence as such this point is ofno use to be seemed into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman Source: Order: Downloads 204 Order Date: 04-FEB-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
For legal professionals, there are specific rules regarding case citation, which vary depending within the court and jurisdiction hearing the case. Proper case law citation inside a state court may not be proper, as well as accepted, for the U.
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252214 Tag:Primarily, this can be a free and democratic region, and once a person becomes a major they can marry whosoever he/she likes; If your parents of your boy or girl don't approve of such inter-caste or interreligious marriage the maximum they're able to do if they're able to Minimize off social relations with the son or even the daughter, but they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes these types of inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or Female that is major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or gentleman that is a major, the few is neither harassed by any person nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anyone who presents this sort of threats or harasses or commits acts of violence either himself or at his instigation, is taken to job by instituting criminal proceedings because of the police against these persons and further stern action is taken against these kinds of person(s) as provided by legislation.
The a lot of this power casts an obligation over the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested to get a crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated. However it truly is made distinct that police is free to acquire action against any person that is indulged in criminal activities matter to law. eight. The DIGP concerned is directed to prioritize this matter and, after hearing both parties within two weeks, address the alleged police misconduct. If the officials are found culpable, departmental proceedings for their punishment must be initiated, plus they shall be assigned non-industry duties from the interim period. Read more
149 . Const. P. 6193/2016 (D.B.) Syed Musawar Shah V/S M.D CSD and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the moment Petition under Article 199 on the Constitution based to the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued to your petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement in the FIR lodged by FIA and inside the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.
A lot of the volumes (together with more recent volumes than the library's holdings) also are offered online through the Caselaw Access Project.
PLR is a revolutionizing platform democratizing and making legal research easy and accessible in Pakistan :
11 . Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi Primarily, this is often a free and democratic nation, and once a person becomes a major they can marry whosoever he/she likes; In the event the parents of the boy or Lady don't approve of these inter-caste or interreligious marriage the maximum they will do if they are able to Slash off social relations with the son or even the daughter, Nonetheless they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes this kind of inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or Lady who is major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or gentleman that's a major, the couple is neither harassed by any person nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anybody who provides these threats or harasses or commits acts of violence either himself or at his instigation, is taken to process by instituting criminal proceedings via the police against such persons and further stern action is taken against these kinds of person(s) as provided by law.
163 . Const. P. 4965/2023 (D.B.) Saleem Khan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It really is properly-settled that when looking at the case of regular promotion of civil servants, the competent authority has got to consider the merit of all the suitable candidates and after due deliberations, to grant promotion to such suitable candidates who will be found being most meritorious among them. Because the petitioner was held to become senior to his colleagues who were promoted in BS-19, the petitioner was dismissed via the respondent department just to extend favor into the blue-eyed candidate based on OPS, which is apathy on the part of your respondent department.
The legislation of necessity acknowledged and upheld by Pakistan's highest judicial body has proved an honorable protection for military adventure in civil government.it absolutely was the illegal action called legislation of necessity..
Under Article 199, the court possesses the authority to review government procedures for reasonableness if applicable in respondent university and to safeguard aggrieved parties' rights. For that reason, this petition is admissible based on established court precedents, along with the respondents' objections are overruled. Read more
The different roles of case regulation in civil and common regulation traditions create differences in how that courts render decisions. Common legislation courts generally explain in detail the legal rationale guiding their decisions, with citations of both legislation and previous relevant judgments, and often interpret the wider legal principles.
seventeen . Const. P. 5/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI 46 I have read the uncovered counsel for that parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments since the issues in the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard towards the interim relief application in terms of Section seven(one) of your Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 at hand over possession in the subjected premises on the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs to get decided from the competent court after hearing the parties if pending given that the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer during the Illegal Dispossession case and as far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court should see this facet for interim custody of the subject premises here In the event the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two months from the date of receipt of this order. Read more
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming on the main case, It is additionally a well-set up proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence during the Stricto-Sensu, use to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion obtain support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty on the charge, however, that is matter to your procedure provided under the relevant rules instead of otherwise, for that reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-take pleasure in the evidence and to reach at its independent findings on the evidence.